Have the Penguin and Panda updates done true justice to web marketing? Probably yes to major extent. At least the concepts that these Algorithms are based on appear quite clear and concise. The concept of Panda took into consideration the total value of a website. If your website has a great design, excellent speed and the users can really vouch on the repeat value of the website then Google panda will assist such sites by bringing them to the top. But hold on, that’s just not enough. Google Penguin provided a much stricter algorithm to verify uniqueness, authentic backlinking and efficient social networking usage. Are there any loopholes with the algorithms? We really don’t know. The fact is that nearly more than 15% search results have been impacted.
Now, I am quite cynical on the philosophy of completely ridiculing some websites instead of just the web pages. Some badly written web pages don’t mean that all web pages on the site will be bad. Google Panda has probably ridiculed quite a few websites completely because of the bad quality of some of their web pages and excessive use of advertisements. But I think there needs to be some change here. I would rather prefer penalizing web pages more than web sites. The primary goal should be to give quality content to the user. If a high quality web page lies on a not so good website then users must still be able to find it quickly. What do you think?
You need to penalize those web pages that are bad but not the entire websites. I hope next Google Panda and Penguin updates do address these issues
http://expertscolumn.com/content/how-not-blog
http://expertscolumn.com/content/how-build-your-personality
http://expertscolumn.com/content/how-be-warren-buffet
http://expertscolumn.com/content/how-market-your-website-or-blog-post-penguin-updates
http://expertscolumn.com/content/life-after-death-does-it-exist
http://expertscolumn.com/content/does-buying-real-estate-make-sense
No comments:
Post a Comment